Intellectual property concept with businessman hold the right properties follow law of inventor for new innovation
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
By Richard Gearhart
Founding Partner

When your patent application is denied, you still have options. One of them is filing a patent appeal with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). But before you take that next step, it’s essential to understand that appealing a rejection is not the same as filing the original application. It requires a focused strategy and attention to detail. In this blog, we’ll walk you through some of the most common mistakes people make during the patent appeal process—and how you can avoid them.

Missing the Appeal Deadline

The clock starts ticking the moment you receive a final rejection. If you plan to appeal, you need to act quickly. Missing deadlines is one of the most common—and most preventable—mistakes applicants make.

Here’s how the timeline breaks down:

  • You must file a notice of appeal within 3 months of the final rejection.
  • After that, you have an additional 2 months to file your appeal brief.

It’s easy to lose track of these dates, especially if you’re juggling other deadlines. We recommend marking these on your calendar and setting reminders to follow up. Don’t wait until the last minute—USPTO deadlines are strict, and there’s little room for error once time runs out.

Failing to Address the Examiner’s Reasons for Rejection

When preparing your appeal, it’s not enough to restate arguments you made during prosecution. A common mistake is ignoring the actual reasons the examiner gave for rejecting your claims.

To move forward, you need to:

  • Carefully review the examiner’s final rejection.
  • Identify the logic or evidence the examiner relied on.
    Respond directly and clearly to those points in your brief.

If you don’t confront the examiner’s reasoning head-on, the PTAB will likely side with the rejection. We recommend outlining the examiner’s key points first and then crafting responses that address each one clearly and thoroughly.

Submitting an Incomplete or Disorganized Appeal Brief

The appeal brief is not a casual letter—it has a required structure. Failing to follow the USPTO’s format or omitting necessary sections can result in delays or even outright dismissal of your appeal.

Your brief should include:

  • A summary of the claimed invention
  • A clear statement of the issues on appeal
  • A response to each ground of rejection
  • Supporting legal arguments, citations, and references

If your brief is hard to follow or missing sections, it can work against you. It’s worth taking the time—or getting help—to make sure everything is in place. A well-organized, concise, and complete brief gives your appeal the best chance of success.

Overloading the Appeal with New Evidence

Many applicants try to fix their rejection by adding new information or documents to the appeal. Unfortunately, this is another misstep. In most cases, you can’t introduce new evidence at this stage.

Trying to slip in new material may:

  • Cause delays
  • Lead to your appeal being dismissed
  • Signal to the PTAB that your earlier application was incomplete

If you’ve come across new evidence that you think strengthens your case, the better move may be to file a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) instead of an appeal. We can help you decide which path makes the most sense.

Trying to Handle the Appeal Alone

Patent appeals are technical and legal in nature. Even if you handled your original application yourself, this next step involves a different set of challenges.

People who go it alone often run into problems like:

  • Misunderstanding the format requirements
  • Failing to make persuasive legal arguments
  • Overlooking procedural rules

The earlier you bring in help, the better your chances are of building a strong appeal from the start.

Let Gearhart Law Help You Move Forward

Patent appeals are demanding, but avoiding these common mistakes can improve your odds. If you’ve received a final rejection and are considering an appeal, we’re here to help. At Gearhart Law, we’ll guide you through the timing, strategy, and structure you need to give your appeal a fair shot. Contact us today to talk about your case and how we can support you through the appeal process. Let’s protect the invention you’ve worked hard to develop.

About the Author
Richard Gearhart, Esq. is the founder of Gearhart Law and the host of a weekly radio show for entrepreneurs called “Passage to Profit”. He has built a firm with an international presence that helps entrepreneurs from around the world with their patent, trademark and copyright needs. Richard commands a breadth of experience that comes from nearly 30 years of practice in the writing and prosecution of hundreds of patents, and in all aspects of Intellectual Property law. In 2022, Richard was recognized by ROI New Jersey as a 2022 ROI Influencer in the Law List category for being one of the best of the best in New Jersey for intellectual property law. Gearhart Law emerged from Richard’s passion for entrepreneurship and startups and his belief that entrepreneurship grows the economy and creates jobs. When we started Gearhart Law, our goal was to help and support the new business ventures of 500 entrepreneurs and inventors. After 12 years, the firm has far surpassed this goal; today, we look forward to helping even more inventors and entrepreneurs get off to a great start and reach their own goals.